To stop trying to do something; to admit defeat or abandon an effort.
To stop trying to do something because it seems too difficult or impossible; to admit that you cannot succeed and abandon your effort. It often implies accepting defeat after a struggle.
Type
Inseparable
Collocations
give up smoking — stop a habit (followed by a gerund)
give up on someone/something — lose hope or stop trying with a person or goal
never give up — a common encouraging phrase
⚠️ Watch out
'Give up' + gerund (give up smoking) is used for habits, while 'give up on' + noun/pronoun (give up on the plan) is used for hopes or goals — the structures aren't interchangeable.
Training for TOEFL & fluency
🎧 Listen · write what you hear · 👁 reveal to compare
In October 1941, with the German army advancing rapidly toward Moscow, Soviet leader Joseph Stalin faced {{enormous|adjective|easy}} pressure to evacuate the capital. Most government ministries had already fled east to Kuibyshev, panic was {{spreading|verb-various-tenses|easy}} through the city, and some senior officials assumed Moscow would fall within days. On October 19, Stalin made a decision: he stayed. He announced a state of siege, appeared publicly in the city, and gave his famous address on November 7 — Revolution Day — standing on Red Square with German forces less than 50 miles away. The speech was broadcast nationally and filmed. Stalin's refusal to abandon Moscow {{steadied|verb-various-tenses|hard}} the Soviet defense. By December, a Soviet counteroffensive had pushed German forces back from the capital's outskirts. Historians debate many of Stalin's choices, {{but|connective|easy}} this particular episode is well documented: the moment when the {{symbolic|adjective|medium}} and military weight of not giving up — of {{visibly|adjective|hard}} refusing to concede — shifted the psychological momentum of an entire campaign. {{Sometimes|connective|medium}}, the decision that changes everything is simply the refusal to {{give up|phrasal-verb|medium}}. {{Indeed|connective|hard}}, that single choice altered the course of the entire war.
To quit or stop means to decide to no longer pursue something after facing difficulty or obstacles, effectively acknowledging that you will not succeed or continue trying. It describes the moment a person consciously chooses to end their efforts rather than persisting;
Type
Intransitive verb / transitive verb (both forms used depending on context)
Collocations
quit trying — used when someone stops making an effort toward a goal
stop pursuing — formal-leaning neutral collocation, common in written English
quit halfway — describes stopping before completion, often with implied regret
stop pushing — suggests ending persistent effort, often used in professional contexts
quit while ahead — idiomatic neutral phrase meaning to stop at a good moment before things worsen
⚠️ Watch out
Be careful with 'stop' followed by a verb: 'stop to do something' means pausing in order to do it, while 'stop doing something' means ceasing the activity — the distinction changes the meaning entirely. 'Quit' is generally followed directly by a gerund ('quit trying') and does not carry this ambiguity.
Training for TOEFL & fluency
🎧 Listen · write what you hear · 👁 reveal to compare
Marta had been applying for editorial positions for almost a year. Every interview seemed promising, but the offers never came. By October, she was ready to stop entirely and return to her previous field.
Then a colleague suggested she reframe her CV to highlight project management skills rather than writing credentials. Marta almost quit before trying the new approach, convinced it wouldn't make a difference.
But she sent three applications that weekend. Within two weeks, she had two interview invitations. Sometimes the right moment to stop is simply a signal to change direction, not to walk away.
The first time Daniel considered whether to stop, he was sitting in a coffee shop at 11 p.m., laptop open, staring at a business plan that had consumed eighteen months of his life. The numbers still didn't work. The market had shifted. Two of his three potential partners had quietly moved on to other projects. And yet he kept returning to the same document, adjusting the same projections, as though persistence alone could rewrite reality.
His mentor, a former operations director with three decades of industry experience, put it plainly during their next meeting. "There's a difference between resilience and stubbornness," she told him. "Resilience means adapting. Stubbornness means doing the same thing and expecting different results."
Daniel didn't quit that afternoon. But the conversation planted something important. Over the following weeks, he began to see the project differently — not as something he had failed, but as something that had run its course. When he finally decided to stop and redirect his energy toward a related but more viable idea, it didn't feel like defeat. It felt like clarity.
Six months later, his new venture had already secured its first client.
In professional contexts, 'abandon / relinquish' means to formally stop pursuing a goal, project, or course of action after concluding that further effort is not viable or worthwhile. It conveys a deliberate, considered decision to admit defeat or cease trying.
Type
Transitive verb
Collocations
abandon a project — used when formally stopping work on a specific initiative
abandon an effort — describes ceasing attempts after sustained but unsuccessful trying
relinquish one's pursuit of — formal phrase for stopping the chase of a goal or objective
abandon all hope of — used to signal a decisive and final admission of defeat
relinquish ambitions — describes formally stepping back from organisational or personal goals
⚠️ Watch out
Be careful not to use 'relinquish' interchangeably with 'abandon' in all contexts — 'relinquish' can also mean to hand over or surrender something to another party, which is a different meaning entirely. In formal written work English, always ensure the surrounding context makes clear that you mean ceasing to try, not transferring ownership or authority.
Training for TOEFL & fluency
🎧 Listen · write what you hear · 👁 reveal to compare
Marcus had led the product launch team for nearly a year. The original deadline had slipped twice, the budget had been revised four times, and two key developers had resigned. In an honest conversation with the CEO, he admitted that the team had reached its limits. The decision was made to abandon the launch and conduct a full strategic reset. It was not a comfortable moment — Marcus had invested deeply in the vision — but he knew that to relinquish the pursuit now was far wiser than continuing to consume resources on a failing trajectory. Sometimes, he reflected, knowing when to stop is the most professional decision a leader can make.
The quarterly board meeting had overrun by forty minutes, and the atmosphere in the room had shifted from tense to quietly resigned. For the past eighteen months, Halcyon Logistics had been attempting to break into the refrigerated freight corridor connecting three northern distribution hubs. The initiative had looked strong on paper: a gap in the market, a willing investor, and an experienced operations team ready to deploy. But the combination of spiralling fuel costs, two failed regulatory approvals, and the unexpected entry of a well-capitalised competitor had fundamentally altered the landscape.
Chief Strategy Officer Priya Mehta stood to address the room. She presented the revised projections without embellishment, allowing the numbers to speak plainly. The corridor opportunity, she concluded, was no longer commercially viable under current conditions. The board voted seven to one to formally abandon the initiative and redirect the earmarked capital to the company's existing southern network, which had shown consistent margin improvement over the same period.
Priya acknowledged privately that it had taken courage to relinquish a project she had championed from the beginning. But clarity, she believed, was always more valuable than persistence for its own sake. The company left the meeting lighter, and more focused, than it had been in over a year.
In academic English, 'cease / desist from' means to formally stop pursuing a course of action or to abandon an endeavour after recognising that further effort is unproductive or untenable. The expression conveys a deliberate, often reasoned withdrawal from an attempt, carrying connotations of intellectual or institutional acknowledgement of defeat.
Type
Verb phrase (intransitive-transitive hybrid: 'cease' is used intransitively or with a gerundive complement; 'desist from' requires a gerundive complement introduced by 'from')
Collocations
cease from pursuing — used when abandoning an active research endeavour or hypothesis
desist from attempting — signals formal withdrawal from a repeated or structured effort
cease from engaging in — appropriate when describing discontinuation of a scholarly or institutional practice
desist from further investigation — commonly found in committee reports and formal academic recommendations
cease from all efforts to — used in stronger, more conclusive academic statements of abandonment
⚠️ Watch out
Writers should note that 'desist from' is more strictly legal and formal in tone than 'cease', and may read as overly legalistic in purely scholarly prose if not contextualised carefully. Additionally, both verbs require a gerundive complement in most academic constructions — writing 'ceased the project' rather than 'ceased from pursuing the project' weakens precision and may be considered grammatically incomplete in formal registers.
Training for TOEFL & fluency
🎧 Listen · write what you hear · 👁 reveal to compare
Dr Adaeze Nwosu had spent three years developing a computational model she believed would transform her field. The results, however, remained stubbornly inconsistent. After her second unsuccessful grant application, her mentor sat with her and spoke plainly: the evidence was not there. Reluctantly, Adaeze ceased from pursuing the original model and pivoted toward a narrower, more tractable question. It stung. She had invested so much. Yet within eighteen months, her revised study was accepted by a leading journal. She later reflected in print that the decision to desist from an unproductive path had been the most professionally courageous — and ultimately the most generative — choice of her early career.
The history of scientific progress is rarely as linear as textbooks imply. For every celebrated breakthrough, there exist dozens of abandoned hypotheses, discontinued trials, and research programmes that simply did not survive contact with empirical reality. Yet institutional narratives within academia have long treated the decision to cease from an unproductive line of inquiry as something to be quietly minimised — a professional embarrassment rather than a legitimate scholarly act. This cultural reticence carries measurable costs. When researchers feel unable to openly acknowledge that they have stepped away from a failing approach, knowledge of what does not work remains undocumented, unpublished, and unavailable to others navigating similar intellectual terrain. The so-called 'file drawer problem' is, in part, a symptom of this reluctance.
A more epistemically honest culture would recognise that the ability to desist from a hypothesis that evidence no longer supports is not a sign of intellectual weakness but of rigorous, self-correcting scholarship. Funding bodies, editorial boards, and doctoral supervisors all have roles to play in normalising this kind of principled withdrawal. Reframing strategic abandonment as a form of methodological integrity — rather than failure — may be among the most consequential cultural shifts available to institutions seeking to improve the long-term health and credibility of academic research.